I know your type. Haven't dealt with your type for a while, but I'll give it a shot. Your argument about values being "inherent" can fizzle into semantics which only mean that the definition of what you consider to be admirable comes from a system - your own. Your manner of judging is flawed. It is systematic and really not based on reality - the individual. How can you possible use your criteria to determine …showed first 75 words of 456 total…

…showed last 75 words of 456 total…judge. It's simply impossible to not discriminate. Otherwise, how does one make decisions and perform normal logical processes? Discriminating is something a sentient being does. Lumping everyone into your cateogory of those who are mental sheep that only echo "fashionable" trends of a postmodernist culture (or whatever you're shooting at) is very childish. It's a cop out, something you accuse of others. But it's your way to control an argument and hold off any counter-attacks.